In July 2025, Amazon surprised the digital ecosystem with a decision that shook the foundations of online marketing: withdrawing completely from Google Shopping.
This decision, carried out within hours between July 21 and 23, removed Amazon's advertising presence from one of the world's most powerful and competitive traffic acquisition channels.
What prompted this move? What consequences does it have for Google, the digital ecosystem, and especially sellers who depend on Amazon traffic and sales?
What Exactly Happened?
Until mid-July 2025, Amazon was one of the leading advertisers on Google Shopping, especially in markets such as the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan. According to Smarter Ecommerce data, Amazon held a 60% impression share on Google Shopping in certain categories. Within two days, however, that figure dropped to zero.
The withdrawal was neither partial nor gradual, but a global, simultaneous, and complete disconnection. Amazon stopped running its sponsored product ads on Google Shopping, also known as PLA or Product Listing Ads, ending a presence it had maintained for more than a decade.
Possible Reasons Behind the Decision:
1. Incrementality testing
Amazon is known for running large-scale experiments. One widely accepted theory is that this is an "incrementality test", an experiment designed to measure how much traffic and sales Google Shopping ads generate compared with organic traffic or traffic from other channels.
If Amazon determines that a significant share of Google-driven conversions would have occurred without paying for those ads, it may conclude that the advertising investment is not profitable.
2. Strengthening its advertising ecosystem
In recent years, Amazon has built its own advertising network, known as Amazon Ads. With tools such as Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, and DSP, it has captured an increasing share of brand and agency budgets. Leaving Google Shopping could be part of a strategy to concentrate resources within its own ecosystem, where Amazon controls the data, audience, and performance.
3. Negotiating with Google
Another possibility is that Amazon is using its withdrawal as leverage to negotiate more favorable terms with Google or demonstrate its market power. By abruptly cutting millions of dollars in spending, Amazon directly affects Google's advertising business.
4. Margin and efficiency optimization
Cost per click (CPC) on Google Shopping has increased across many verticals. Because Amazon operates on tight margins in certain categories, it may have decided that competing for this traffic is no longer worthwhile when it can reach audiences through its own platform.
Consequences for Amazon Sellers
Amazon's withdrawal from Google Shopping has direct implications for sellers who depend on the marketplace. Although most did not advertise directly on Google Shopping, many benefited from the free or shared traffic Amazon acquired through the channel.
1. Less incoming traffic from Google
Amazon used to capture some external traffic from Google and redirect it to product pages on its site. With these ads gone, certain products may receive fewer external visits, potentially reducing sales, especially for highly competitive products.
2. Greater need for direct investment
Sellers will need to take a more proactive role. Those seeking to offset lost visibility should consider:
- Investing more in Amazon Ads (Sponsored Products, Brands, Display)
- Using Amazon Attribution to track external campaigns
- Running their own Google Search or Shopping campaigns, linking to their own sites or Amazon
3. More internal competition on Amazon Ads
If Amazon channels more traffic through its own advertising system, sellers may face greater competition for keywords and promoted placements within the marketplace. This may result in higher CPCs on Amazon Ads.
4. A window of opportunity for agile sellers
On the other hand, those who adapt quickly can gain an advantage. Lower competition on Google Shopping may allow sellers with their own online stores to acquire more traffic at a lower cost and with less competitive pressure.